Pepperdine
Criminal Law · Pepperdine University · Colleen Graffy · Fall 2025
Eighteen hypos, each answered twice: at common law and under the Model Penal Code. Nothing reveals until both columns are committed. Feedback names the split (provocation, self-defence, duress, necessity, attempt, solicitation, conspiracy, accomplice liability, insanity) and an end-of-drill diagnostic names your weakest topic.
Eighteen Criminal Law hypos at Pepperdine answered twice—once under common law and once under the Model Penal Code—with a commit gate revealing where the doctrines split on provocation, self-defense, duress, necessity, attempt, solicitation, conspiracy, accomplice liability, and insanity. A per-topic diagnostic identif
Built from prompt
Make a free account to open this one — and one more — on us. No card needed.
Already have an account? Log in
Want unlimited access? Standard · $24.99/4 months


Build a common-law versus MPC drill from the Criminal Law final outline: a mens rea mapping figure, 18 two-column hypos with a commit gate on both columns, a where-they-split line per hypo, a per-topic diagnostic, and a doctrine-by-doctrine reference table with a topic filter.